Deans Debate Future of Law Schools

Four distinguished law school deans held a lively discussion about the future of law school education before a capacity crowd Thursday at the State Bar Annual Meeting. Roger Cossack - who is participating in his eighth consecutive Annual Meeting! - moderated the debate, which was part of the Future of the Profession CLE. The panel included Ken Starr (pictured, left) of Pepperdine Law School, Larry Sager of the University of Texas Law School, John Attanasio (pictured, right) of Southern Methodist University, and Brad Toben of Baylor Law School. The hot topic was the rising cost of law school education. All agreed that tuition is too high but that there are no easy solutions. Increasing scholarship budgets and providing loan forgiveness programs help, but "most law schools are vitally tuition dependent," said Starr, adding that alumni associations need to get "radically interested" in this issue. Toben raised the issue of law schools' dependence on the U.S. News & World Report rankings, perceived as all important by many prospective students and law firm recruiters. "Too much money is being spent to get better rankings," he said. Sager added that the system makes it difficult for schools to view students holistically rather than as a number because the ranking focuses on how much schools spend per student. "That's a huge variable," said Sager.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://blog.texasbar.com/admin/trackback/141937
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Russ Hunt Jr - October 24, 2010 1:31 PM

Interesting blog posting (not mine) arguing that we just have too many law schools pumping out too many lawyers that are not needed in this economy:

http://tinyurl.com/2f9h374

Clay S. Conrad - August 19, 2009 3:04 PM

Law school is not too expensive. Law school is just too easy to get into.

Students straight from college, with no real-world experience, should never be allowed into law school. A law license is too much power to give to a 25 year old who has never even supported him or herself, or held a real job.

One of the reasons we have so many bad lawyers is that we have naive, inexperienced, unknowlegeable people trying to educate the lives of their more worldly clients. This leads to arrogance and incompetence in the real world -- both of which are fatal to good lawyering.

It seems that the panel was more interested in the business of running law schools than in providing quality legal education. Why am I not surprised?

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.